tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8645158909573544394.post2412151164356348282..comments2019-11-12T01:57:19.888-08:00Comments on The Modern Jackass: Leggings Are Not Pants!!!!The Modern Jackasshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17423959398790818593noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8645158909573544394.post-55999051384560621742009-04-16T21:27:00.000-07:002009-04-16T21:27:00.000-07:00disagreed. if leggings are not see-through, and ap...disagreed. if leggings are not see-through, and appropriate shoes and undergarments are worn, and the shirt is long enough, THEY'RE FINE!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8645158909573544394.post-31515230023462118232009-04-15T09:56:00.000-07:002009-04-15T09:56:00.000-07:00OK - I am in total agreement that leggings are not...OK - I am in total agreement that leggings are not PANTS. However, if they are not opaque (or you cannot see through them in any way, shape, or form), then I believe they can be worn with a shirt (vs. dress) as LONG AS the shirt reaches the bottom of your butt. This is especially true for cool, patterned and/or festive leggings, as you don't want to detract from the awesomeness of them with superfluous fabric.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18165609347037066721noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8645158909573544394.post-7135870033894881532009-04-05T19:27:00.000-07:002009-04-05T19:27:00.000-07:00Totally disagree, Mr. Jasper! If a woman has an am...Totally disagree, Mr. Jasper! If a woman has an amazing body then she can wear whatever she likes. Next thing I know, you're going to say a woman can't wear a bra as a top. Wait, you think that already, don't you? I am repulsed by your fascist beliefs!Shamsul Chowdhuryhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01613076880215818173noreply@blogger.com